ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

JOHN MAUZY PITTMAN, JUDGE

DIVISION II

LARRY EGBERT

APPELLANT

V.

STATE OF ARKANSAS

APPELLEE

CACR01-1330

December 4, 2002

APPEAL FROM THE CRITTENDEN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

[NO. CR 93-137]

HON. WILLIAM L. FERGUS,

JUDGE

AFFIRMED

The appellant, Larry Egbert, pled guilty to burglary in May 1993 and was placed on supervised probation for ten years. The State filed a petition to revoke his probationary sentence on August 2, 2001, alleging that he violated the conditions of his probation in several respects, including nonpayment of fines, possession of a controlled substance, engaging in harassing communications, and terroristic threatening. After a hearing, appellant was found to have violated the conditions of his probation and was sentenced to ten years' imprisonment followed by suspended imposition of any additional sentence for a period of ten years.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Rule 4-3(j) of the Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals, appellant's attorney has filed a motion

to withdraw as counsel on the ground that the appeal is wholly without merit. The motion is accompanied by an abstract and brief referring to everything in the record that might arguably support the appeal, including all motions, objections, and requests decided adversely to appellant and a statement of reasons why none of those rulings would be a meritorious ground for reversal.

The clerk of this court furnished appellant with a copy of his counsel's brief and notified him of his right to file a pro se brief within thirty days. Appellant did not file a brief. From our review of the record and the brief presented to us, we find compliance with Rule 4-3(j) and that the appeal is without merit. Accordingly, counsel's motion to be relieved is granted, and the order of revocation is affirmed.

Griffen and Neal, JJ., agree.