Threadgill v. State (Per Curiam) CR00-758

Appeal & error -- Motion for rule on clerk; good cause for granting. [HTML, WP5.1]

Golden v. State (Per Curiam) 99-572

Juveniles - Due process rights not violated by trial court's refusal to assert insanity defense; rational basis exists to affoed juvienile defendants fewer procedural rights than criminal defendants. [HTML, WP5.1]

SEECO, Inc. v. Hales (Per Curiam) 99-800

Oil & gas -- Breach of leases; administrative orders did not provide defense to royalty owners' claims; failure to enforce contract; no basis for reversal of award of damages; trial court did not err in denying directed verdict or JNOV where proof constituted substantial evidence to support verdict; supreme court affirmed on issue of duty to disclose; no basis for reversing jury's determination that appellees exercised due diligence; no error in trial judge's determination of venue; judge's decision to allow second closing rebuttal was not arbitrary or groundless under unique circumstances of case; trial judge did not abuse discretion in denying concessions; complaint was timely filed; damages for breach of take-or-pay rights; appellants' argument meritless. [HTML, WP5.1]

In Re: Redden (Per Curiam) [HTML, WP5.1]

In Re: Madden (Per Curiam) [HTML, WP5.1]

PER CURIAM ORDERS

REHEARINGS DENIED: Petitions for rehearing were denied today in the following cases.

99-572. Andrew Douglas Golden v. State of Arkansas, from Craighead Chancery, Western District. See substituted opinion.  (7 PAGES + 4-PAGE DISSENT PUBLISHED) [HTML, WP5.1]

99-707. Timothy Davis Fox et al. v. Green Bay Packing, from Pulaski Chancery, Fifth Division.

99-800. SEECO, Inc. et al. v. Allen Hales et al., from Sebastian Circuit, Fort Smith District. See substituted opinion.  (46 PAGES + 2-PAGE CONCURRENCE PUBLISHED) [HTML, WP5.1]

00-130. Charles Frances v. Gaylord Container Corporation, from Workers' Compensation Commission.

*****************************

REVIEW GRANTED: Petition for review was granted today in the following case.

00-725. Molly M. Howell v. Scroll Technologies, from Workers' Compensation Commission.

******************************

REVIEWS DENIED: Petitions for review were denied today in the following cases.

00-631. MDH Builders, Inc. v. Nabholz Construction Corp., from Pulaski Chancery, Sixth Division.

00-663. Kimberly L. Vann (Dill) v. Richard M. Cook, from Lonoke Circuit.

00-687. Cheryl Downing v. University of Arkansas, from Workers' Compensation Commission.

00-688. Mary Goolsby v. Death & Permanent Total Disability, from Workers' Compensation Commission.

00-723. Richard Dale Smith v. Hot Springs Village Property Owners Association, from Workers' Compensation Commission.

00-727. James D. Pizzimenti v. AAA Storage Center, Inc., from Workers' Compensation Commission.

00-752. Herbert Brake v. The Kroger Company, Inc., from Workers' Compensation Commission.

*****************************

CR99-618. State of Arkansas v. Gregory R. Larimore, from Crittenden Circuit. Appellee's motion to release and retain exhibits is granted provided copies are substituted.

CR00-31. Willard Mann v. State of Arkansas, from Cleburne Circuit. Appellee's motion to dismiss appeal is granted.

CR00-64. Rodolfo Sanchez v. State of Arkansas, from Sevier Circuit. Appellee's motion to dismiss appeal is granted.

CR00-123. Nelson Garth v. State of Arkansas, from Drew Circuit. Appellee's motion to dismiss appeal and alternative motion to stay the briefing schedule. Denied without prejudice.

CR00-529. Demetrus Butler v. State of Arkansas, from Pulaski Circuit, Seventh Division. Appellee's motion to dismiss appeal is granted.

CR00-562. Eddie Eugene Thompson v. State of Arkansas, from Sebastian Circuit, Fort Smith District. Appellant's motion to file supplemental brief is granted.

CR00-562. Eddie Eugene Thompson v. State of Arkansas, from Sebastian Circuit, Fort Smith District. Appellee's motion to file supplemental brief is granted.

CR00-564. Teresa Lynn Miner v. State of Arkansas, from Sebastian Circuit, Fort Smith District. Appellant's motion to file supplemental brief is granted.

CR00-564. Teresa Lynn Miner v. State of Arkansas, from Sebastian Circuit, Fort Smith District. Appellee's motion to file supplemental brief is granted.

CR00-758. Marcus Threadgill v. State of Arkansas, from Miller Circuit. Motion for rule on the clerk is granted. See per curiam this date. (1 PAGE PUBLISHED) [HTML, WP5.1]

99-572. Andrew Douglas Golden v. State of Arkansas, from Craighead Chancery, Western District. Motion for stay of mandate is granted.

99-800. SEECO, Inc. et al. v. Allen Hales et al., from Sebastian Circuit, Fort Smith District. Motion to expedite. Moot. See substituted opinion.

99-1428. Carolyn Robinson v. Jerry Taylor, Mayor of Pine Bluff, from Jefferson Circuit. Appellant's motion for oral argument is denied.

00-499. Fred Duvall et al. v. Dale Lynch, County Judge, from Van Buren Circuit. Appellee's motion to dismiss appeal is granted.

00-567. Pervis Michael Redden v. Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct, from Pulaski Circuit, Third Division. Appellant's motion to dismiss appeal is granted.

00-593. Ultracuts Ltd. et al. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., from Benton Circuit. Appellant's motion to file supplemental brief is granted. Corbin, J., not participating.

00-593. Ultracuts Ltd. et al. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., from Benton Circuit. Appellee's motion to file supplemental brief is granted. Corbin, J., not participating.

In Re: Pervis Michael Redden, Arkansas Bar ID #74127. Petition for disbarment. See per curiam this date. (1 PAGE PUBLISHED) [HTML, WP5.1]

In Re: Harold W. Madden, Arkansas Bar ID #73074. Surrender of license. See per curiam this date. (1 PAGE PUBLISHED) [HTML, WP5.1]

In Re: Enrollment of Attorneys. Following the State Bar Examination in July of this year, and the certification by the Board of those who passed the examination and met all other requirements, thereupon, while the Court is in recess, any Justice of this Court, after satisfying himself of all the above essentials, may authorize and empower the clerk of this Court to enroll such successful candidates as of the date such Justice so acts.

****************************

In Re: Mandates of the Supreme Court of the United States. The clerk is directed to file any mandate received from the United States Supreme Court during recess of this Court, and issue mandate of this Court in compliance therewith.

******************************

In Re: Procedure while Court is in Recess. During the recess of this Court any individual Justice may act upon matters presented to the Court; provided, however, matters usually acted upon by the entire Court shall not be acted upon by an individual Justice until after the clerk or his deputy has attempted to contact as many of the Justices as possible.