Reporter's Note on Subpoena Form

Addition to Reporter's Notes Regarding Subpoena Form (January 2002):

This form was designed for civil cases, including probate and juvenile matters, and should not be used in criminal proceedings. It is based on the form used in the federal courts. See Form AO 88, Subpoena in a Civil Case (Rev. 1994), reprinted in 1B Federal Procedural Forms §§ 1:1270 (1999). However, it departs from the federal model as necessary to accommodate differences between the Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure and the federal rules.

Rule 45 does not mention the form, but the Supreme Court's order of adoption describes it as "official." In re Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure, 340 Ark. 731, 733 (2000). Although use of an exact reproduction of the form is not mandatory, a subpoena must include all information called for by the form. For example, the second page of the form contains a "notice to persons subject to subpoenas" intended to advise those persons of their rights and duties under Rule 45. A subpoena without this information would be subject to challenge. However, so long as the necessary information is included, use of a "home-grown" document should not be fatal.

Additional information may be included if it is not inconsistent with Rule 45 or the form itself. For instance, a subpoena issued by the clerk might contain the name, address and phone number of the attorney who requested its issuance. Other information can be added in certain spaces on the form. The division in which the case is pending may also be included along with the street address in the box labeled "place of testimony."

On the other hand, modification of the form in such a way that distorts the controlling law or misleads the recipient is impermissible. Under Rule 45(b), for example, a subpoena duces tecum directed to a non-party is permissible only in connection with a deposition, hearing, or trial. Consequently, adding to the form a box to be checked and an accompanying statement to the effect that the recipient is commanded to permit inspection of specified documents at counsel's office on a given date, is not permissible. By contrast, the federal form offers this option, which is available under the federal rules. See Rules 34(c) & 45(a)(1)(C), Fed. R. Civ. P.

Unless a statute provides a procedure different from that specified in Rule 45, the rule and the form are applicable in probate and juvenile cases. Certain probate matters - such as will contests and adoptions - are "special proceedings" within the meaning of Rule 81(a) and thus excepted from the Rules of Civil Procedure if a statute sets out a different procedure. E.g., Brantley v. Davis, 305 Ark. 68, 805 S.W.2d 75 (1991). Some juvenile matters may also be special proceedings. See Kelley v. State, 191 Ark. 848, 88 S.W.2d 65 (1935). If there is no such statute, then the rules apply. Norton v. Hinson, 337 Ark. 487, 989 S.W.2d 535 (1999).

There appears to be only one statute that uses the word "subpoena" in connection with probate cases, and it does not conflict with Rule 45. See Ark. Code Ann. § 5-2-317(b)(3). By statute, the Rules of Civil Procedure apply to "all proceedings" in juvenile cases "until rules of procedure for juvenile court are developed and in effect," except as otherwise provided by the juvenile code. Ark. Code Ann. §§ 9-27-325(f). No such rules have been promulgated, and the only statute dealing with subpoenas in juvenile cases is not inconsistent with Rule 45. See Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-310(e). Accordingly, the rule and the subpoena form apply in probate and juvenile proceedings.