|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Court Administration |
|
|
|
The administration of the
Arkansas court system is accomplished by a combination of state, county and local
officials, lay and professional committees, and judicial and court employee associations.
A partial unification of the administration of the court system occurred in 1965 when the
General Assembly adopted legislation providing that "The Arkansas Supreme Court shall
have general superintending control over the administration of justice in all courts in
the State of Arkansas. The Chief Justice shall be directly responsible for the efficient
operation of the judicial branch and of its constituent courts and for the expeditious
dispatch of litigation therein and the proper conduct of the business of the courts. In
aid of this responsibility, the Chief Justice may appoint a Director of the Administrative
Office of the Courts, such appointment to be approved by the Arkansas Judicial Council and
the remaining members of the Supreme Court."
Arkansas Judicial Council, Inc.
The Arkansas Judicial Council consists of all judges of the circuit and chancery
courts, Court of Appeals, Justices of the Supreme Court, retired justices and judges, and
the Director of the Administrative Office of the Courts. The Council acts as the official
body representing the states judiciary. It was organized "to foster and
preserve the integrity, dignity, and independence of the judiciary; to promote uniformity
and dispatch in judicial administration; to develop, implement and maintain a program of
judicial education preassisting members newly elected or appointed to the bench; to
provide continuing judicial education for members accommodating the diverse needs of
chancellors, circuit judges and appellate justices; and to select members to the Judicial
Retirement Board." The Council has the specific statutory responsibility of making
recommendations to the General Assembly on judicial redistricting and the addition of new
judgeships in the state. Formal business of the Council is conducted in spring and fall
meetings each year.
 |
|
Arkansas
Judicial Council Board of Directors & Officers |
|
| Front Row (L-R): Judge John Dan Kemp, Judge Kathleen Bell,
Judge Rita Gruder, J.D. Gingerich Back
Row (L-R) Judge Ralph Wilson,
Judge Robert McCorkindale, Judge Edward Jones, Judge John Cole, Judge Graham Partlow |
|
Administrative Office of the Courts
The Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) is the administrative office for the
non-judicial business of the state courts. The office provides services to the court
system, state and local government, and the public.
The AOC provides educational opportunities for trial and appellate court judges,
municipal judges, court clerks, court reporters, case coordinators, and law clerks.
Orientation programs for new judges is also a part of the ongoing education program and
the division oversees the budget for all out-of-state educational programs. The division
includes a public education component to help educate students and private citizens about
the court system. The director of publications also works within the division. The office
routinely publishes educational pamphlets, statistical reports, special research reports,
and a bi-monthly newsletter. The division includes the states court
interpreter/translator who is responsible for foreign language interpretation and services
to the hearing and sight impaired for all courts in the state.
Several attorneys provide ongoing legal assistance to all judges and local officials.
Specific legal research requests are accepted and major policy proposals and research are
completed on behalf of the Judicial Council, the Supreme Court, the Governors
Office, and the General Assembly.
A staff of automation and records specialists is responsible for the collection and
dissemination of court data from all courts in the state. Data auditors regularly travel
to all courthouses in the state in order to collect and confirm the reliability of data.
The division is also responsible for the implementation of all court automation projects
within the state.
The AOC also houses and staffs the Arkansas Alternate Dispute Resolution Commission,
which is responsible for the implementation of ADR programs, education, and the
certification of ADR professionals, and the states Court Appointed Special Advocates
(CASA) program.
Supreme Court Committees
The Arkansas Supreme Court carries out many of its administrative responsibilities
through the work of several committees. Each committee is made up of judges, attorneys,
and lay persons and one liaison justice of the Supreme Court. Staffing for the committees
is provided by the Office of Professional Programs, the Office of Professional Conduct,
and the Administrative Office of the Courts. The 1997-98 committees and their chairpersons
included the following:
Committee on Criminal Practice: Judge Robert
Edwards
Committee on Civil Practice: Judge John Ward
Criminal Jury Instruction: Hon. Jackson Jones
Civil Jury Instruction: Hon. David Blair
Board of Certified Court Reporter Examiners: Judge Tom Smitherman
Unauthorized Practice of Law: Mr. Ernest B. Matkin
Board of Law Examiners: Hon. Jim Ross
Committee on Professional Conduct: Hon. Bart Virden
Alternate Committee on Professional Conduct: Hon. David Solomon
Continuing Legal Education Board: Ms. Margaret Woolfolk
Client Security Fund: Hon. Judith DeSimone
Board of Legal Specialization: Hon. Wyckliff Nisbet
Committee on Automation: Judge David Bogard
Committee on Child Support: Judge Warren Kimbrough
Foster Care and Adoption Assessment: Judge Annabelle Imber |
|
|
|
Funding of the
Judiciary |
|
|
|
Arkansas courts are financed
through state, county and city appropriations. The degree of funding from each source
depends upon the level of jurisdiction of the court being funded. State government is the
sole funding source for the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, appellate court support
staff, and the Administrative Office of the Courts. In addition, the state funds the
salaries and costs of travel and educational assistance for circuit and chancery judges,
and the salaries for court reporters and case coordinators. The state also pays for
one-half of the salaries of juvenile intake and probation officers who serve the judges of
the juvenile division of chancery court. Beginning January 1, 1998, the state assumed the
responsibility for the salaries of the public defender system. State government has
budgeted over $25 million for these costs for fiscal year 1997-98. The operating funds
apportioned to the courts at this level represent less than one-fourth of one percent of
the total state government operating appropriation which totaled over $12 billion in
1997-98. This amount includes all state and federal funds appropriated by the state. County
government is the funding source for the salaries of all circuit, chancery and probate
court support and clerical staff and for all supplies, equipment, utilities and facilities
within each judicial circuit. Each county within the circuit provides funding according to
its pro rata share of the district-wide court expenses and is solely responsible for the
costs of facilities and utilities within the county. County government pays all expenses
of the county court, court of common pleas, and justice of the peace courts. The county
government also shares with city government the cost of the municipal court. The county
share is usually 50%, but there are numerous exceptions to this pattern in a variety of
locally negotiated arrangements.
City government is responsible for the remainder of municipal court expenses not
provided by county government and provides the sole support for city and police courts.
A major shift in the way the state judiciary is funded began in 1995 with the adoption
of the Uniform Court Cost Act and the creation of the State Administration of Justice
Fund. This structure allows for the gradual shifting of funding for the courts from the
city and county level to the state level. During the first year, trial court
administrative assistants were transferred from county to state employment. More recently,
the public defender system was transferred. A 1999 legislative proposal would transfer
deputy prosecutors and other employees of the elected prosecuting attorneys to the state
system. |
|
|
|
| 34.25% |
Education |
| 21.5% |
Other State Agencies & Boards |
| 19% |
Human Services |
| 17% |
Aid to Cities & Counties |
| 6.75% |
Highway & Transporation |
| 1% |
Other Constitutional Offices |
| .25% |
Legislative Offices |
| .25% |
Judicial Offices |
|
|
|
|
|
|